Some cool acquire wholesale from china images:
Not specifically what she expected when he said they have been going out to dinner!
Image by Neil. Moralee
Fish and chips became a stock meal among the functioning classes in Excellent Britain as a consequence of the fast improvement of trawl fishing in the North Sea, and the improvement of railways which connected the ports to main industrial cities throughout the second half of the 19th century, which meant that fresh fish could be quickly transported to the heavily populated locations. In 1860, the first fish and chip shop was opened in London by Joseph Malin.
Deep-fried chips (slices or pieces of potato) as a dish may possibly have first appeared in Britain in about the identical period: the Oxford English Dictionary notes as its earliest usage of "chips" in this sense the mention in Dickens’ A Tale of Two Cities (published in 1859): "Husky chips of potatoes, fried with some reluctant drops of oil".
The contemporary fish-and-chip shop ("chippy" or "chipper" in contemporary British slang) originated in the United Kingdom, even though outlets promoting fried food occurred generally throughout Europe. According to a single story, fried-potato shops spreading south from Scotland merged with fried-fish shops spreading from southern England. Early fish-and-chip shops had only really basic facilities. Usually these consisted principally of a massive cauldron of cooking fat, heated by a coal fire. In the course of Globe War II fish and chips remained one of the handful of foods in the United Kingdom not topic to rationing.
The dish became popular in wider circles in London and South East England in the middle of the 19th century (Charles Dickens mentions a "fried fish warehouse" in Oliver Twist, 1st published in 1838), while in the north of England a trade in deep-fried chipped potatoes developed. The initial chip shop stood on the present website of Oldham’s Tommyfield Industry. It remains unclear specifically when and exactly where these two trades combined to become the fish-and-chip shop market we know these days. Joseph Malin opened the 1st recorded combined fish-and-chip shop in London in 1860 or in 1865, although a Mr Lees pioneered the concept in the North of England, in Mossley, in 1863.
The idea of a fish restaurant was introduced by Samuel Isaacs (born 1856 in Whitechapel, London died 1939 in Brighton, Sussex) who ran a thriving wholesale and retail fish enterprise throughout London and the South of England in the latter part of the 19th century. Isaacs’ 1st restaurant opened in London in 1896 serving fish and chips, bread and butter, and tea for nine pence, and its recognition ensured a fast expansion of the chain.
The restaurants had been carpeted, had waited service, tablecloths, flowers, china and cutlery, and made the trappings of upmarket dining inexpensive to the operating classes for the very first time. They were positioned in Tottenham Court Road, St Pancras, The Strand, Hoxton, Shoreditch, Brixton and other London districts, as nicely as Clacton, Brighton, Ramsgate, Margate and other seaside resorts in southern England. Menus have been expanded in the early 20th century to include meat dishes and other variations as their recognition grew to a total of thirty restaurants. Sam Isaacs’ trademark was the phrase "This is the Plaice" combined with a image of the punned-upon fish in query. A glimpse of the old Brighton restaurant at No.1 Marine Parade can be observed in the background of Norman Wisdom’s 1955 film A single Great Turn just as Norman/Pitkin runs onto the seafront. Coincidentally, this is now the site of a Harry Ramsden’s fish and chips restaurant. A blue plaque at Oldham’s Tommyfield Industry marks the 1st chips fried in Britain in 1860, and the origin of the fish and chip shop and quickly meals industries in Britain.
WHY THE JEWS? …item 1 & two.. Legitimizing Anti-Semitism — Understanding the root of the world’s longest hatred. — Applying the Litmus Test (January 16, 2012 / 21 Tevet 5772) …
Image by marsmet543
What is exceptional about the publication of this hateful piece of anti-Semitic trash, is that it was enthusiastically endorsed by two prominent American professors, John Mearsheimer and Richard Falk, who urged readers, which includes students, to study, “reflect upon” and “discuss widely” the themes of Atzmon’s book.
In no way just before has any such book received the imprimatur of such established academics.
.
……..***** All images are copyrighted by their respective authors …….
.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
.
…..item 1)…. aish.com …. Legitimizing Anti-Semitism … Why anti-Semitism is moving toward the mainstream. …
by Alan M. Dershowitz
January 16, 2012 / 21 Tevet 5772
.
………………………………………………….
img code photo …. Legitimizing Anti-Semitism
media.aish.com/images/LegitimizingAntiSemitism230.jpg
………………………………………………….
.
www.aish.com/jw/s/Legitimizing_Anti-Semitism.html
For the first time given that the end of Planet War II, classic anti-Semitic tropes—“the Jews” handle the world and are to blame for every thing that goes incorrect, such as the monetary crisis the Jews killed Christian young children in order to use the blood to bake Matzo the Holocaust by no means happened—are becoming acceptable and reputable subjects for academic and political discussion. To understand why these absurd and reprehensible views, once reserved for the racist fringes of academia and politics, are now moving closer to the mainstream, think about the attitudes of two males, a single an academic, the other a politician, toward these who express or endorse such bigotry. The academic is Professor Brian Leiter. The politician is Ron Paul.
You’ve probably in no way heard of Leiter. He’s a reasonably obscure professor of jurisprudence, who is attempting to elevate his profile by publishing a gossipy blog about law school professors. He is a colleague of John
Mearsheimer, a prominent and world well-known professor at the University of Chicago.
Numerous months ago Mearsheimer enthusiastically endorsed a book, really a pamphlet, that integrated all the classic anti-Semitic tropes. It was entitled “The Wandering Who” and written by Gilad Atzmon, a British version of David Duke, who plays the saxophone and has no academic connections. Atzmon writes that we need to take “very seriously” the claim that “the Jewish men and women are attempting to control the globe.” He calls the current credit crunch “the Zio punch.” He says “the Holocaust narrative” does not make “historical sense” and expresses doubt that Auschwitz was a death camp. He invites students to accept the “accusations of Jews making Matzo out of young Goyim’s blood.”
Books and pamphlets of this sort are written each and every day by obscure anti-Semites and published by disreputable presses that specialize in this type of garbage. No a single ever requires notice, except for neo-Nazis around the globe who welcome any additions to the literature of hate.
What is exceptional about the publication of this hateful piece of anti-Semitic trash, is that it was enthusiastically endorsed by two prominent American professors, John Mearsheimer and Richard Falk, who urged readers, like students, to read, “reflect upon” and “discuss widely” the themes of Atzmon’s book. Never ever just before has any such book received the imprimatur of such established academics.
I was not shocked by these endorsements, simply because I knew that each of these academics had previously crossed “red lines,” separating legitimate criticism of Israel from subtle anti-Semitism. Mearsheimer has accused American Jews of dual loyalty, and Falk has repeatedly compared Israel to Nazi Germany. Both had been so enthusiastic about Atzmon’s anti-Zionism—he has written that Israel is “worse” than the Nazis—that they had been ready to give him a pass on his classic “blood libel” anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial. No fantastic surprise there.
Click here to receive Aish.com’s totally free weekly email.
What was surprising—indeed shocking—was the reality that Mearsheimer’s fairly apolitical colleague, Brian Leiter, rushed to Mearsheimer’s defense. Without having bothering even to read Atzmon’s book, Leiter pronounced that Atzmon’s “positions [do not mark him] as an anti-Semite [but rather as] cosmopolitan.”
Leiter also certified that Atzmon “does not deny the Holocaust or the gas chambers.” Had Leiter read the book, he could not have created either statement.
Atzmon himself credits “a man who…was an anti-Semite” for “many of [his] insights” and calls himself a “self-hating Jew” who has contempt for “the Jew in me.” If that is not an admission of anti-Semitism, rather than “cosmopolitanism,” I do not know what is. As far as the Holocaust is concerned, Atzmon asserts that it is not “an historical narrative.” And as to the gas chambers, he doubts that the “Nazis ran a death factory in Auschwitz-Berkanau.”
Leiter went so far as to condemn those who dared to criticize Mearsheimer for endorsing Atzmon’s book, calling their criticism “hysterical” and not “advance[ing] sincere intellectual discourse.” And he defended Mearsheimer’s endorsement as “straight forward.”
The Brian Leiters of the planet are an crucial portion of the cause why anti-Semitic tropes are creeping back to legitimacy in academia. His knee-jerk defense of an admitted Jew hater—who, according to Leiter is not a despicable anti-Semite but an acceptable “cosmopolitan”—contributes to the legitimization of anti-Semitism.
Related Seminar: Why the Jews?
.
………………………………………………..
…. aish.com … Residence .. SEMINARS .. WHY THE JEWS …. Understanding the root of the world’s longest hatred.
January 16, 2012 / 21 Tevet 5772
by Raphael Shore
………………………………………………..
.
The identical can be said of Ron Paul, who every person has heard of. Paul has, according to The New York Occasions, refused to “disavow” the “support” of “white supremacists, survivalists and anti-Zionists who have rallied behind his candidacy.” (These “anti-Zionists” believe that “Zionists”—Jews—control the globe, have been responsible for the bombing of the Oklahoma federal constructing, and brought on the economic downturn, due to the fact “most of the leaders involved in the federal and international banking program are Jews.”) He allowed his “Ron Paul survival report” to espouse David Duke type racism and anti-Semitism for years for the duration of the 1990s, claiming he was unaware that they were being promoted below his name. Edward H. Crane, the founder of the libertarian CATO Institute, has said, “I wish Ron would condemn those fringe items that float around” his campaign, but he refuses to reject the support of these anti-Semites who type a important part of his base. The New York Occasions has criticized Paul for his failure to “convincingly repudiate racist remarks that have been published beneath his name for years—or the enthusiastic assistance he is getting from racist groups,” which includes these that espouse “anti-Semitism and far appropriate paranoia.”
Even now, Paul continues to accept contributions from Holocaust deniers, from these who blame the Jews for almost everything and from other bigots, therefore lending some degree of legitimacy to their hateful views.
It has been stated that “all that is essential for the triumph of evil is that good men do practically nothing.” Leiter and
Paul may or may not be good guys, but they are guilty of much more than merely carrying out nothing at all. They are, by their actions, assisting to genuine the oldest of bigotries. Shame on them!
.
.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
.
…..item two)…. aish.com … Why the Jews – Element 1 …. Understanding the root of the world’s longest hatred.
.
……………………………………
img code photo … WHY THE JEWS? …
media.aish.com/images/why_the_jews_230x150_m.jpg
……………………………………
.
.
by Raphael Shore
January 16, 2012 / 21 Tevet 5772
www.aish.com/sem/wtj/82875402.html
Prejudice, it seems, is a common fare of life. In his folksong entitled "National Brotherhood Week," Tom Lehrer sings:
Oh the Protestants hate the Catholics,
and the Catholics hate the Protestants,
and the Hindus hate the Muslims
and everyone hates the Jews.
In this song, Lehrer expresses the truism that hatred for the Jew is uniquely commonplace. The Crusades, Spanish Inquisition, blood libels, pogroms, countless expulsions and the systematic murder of six million.
The query is: Why? What lies behind these millennium of hatred? Why has the undercurrent of anti-Semitism bubbled and boiled and exploded against Jews everywhere, time and again throughout history?
In this 8-component seminar, we will examine the root purpose for the world’s longest hatred.
—— Causes versus Excuses – How Can We Tell the Difference?
When we study any theory, it is critical to distinguish amongst a "cause" and an "excuse." The distinction is not hard to recognize:
When 1 point causes one more, if we eliminate the lead to, the impact need to vanish. If, on the other hand, a single point is an excuse for one more, then even following taking away the excuse, the effect will stay.
A youngster who is chronically late to school may say in his defense, "But I don’t have a watch. How do you anticipate me to get to school in time if I don’t have a watch?"
If his parents would purchase him a watch and he would nonetheless be late for school, then it is clear that the lack of a watch was just an excuse for his lateness, not its result in.
Regarding anti-Semitism, if we succeed in identifying the cause for anti-Semitism, then eliminating that must put an finish to hatred for the Jews. Even so, if we can get rid of it and the hatred remains, then we know that what we believed was a result in is truly an excuse.
—— .. The Six Frequent Causes for anti-Semitism
Keep this distinction in mind as we explore the six most often provided motives for anti-Semitism. As we touch upon every single of these explanations, we will try to ascertain whether or not it is the lead to of the hatred, or merely an excuse.
Historians and sociologists have come up with many theories to explain anti-Semitism. We will examine these 1 by one, and discuss the validity of every.
….. Financial: Jews are hated since they possess too much wealth and power.
….. Selected Men and women: Jews are hated since they arrogantly claim they are the chosen folks.
….. Scapegoat: Jews are a convenient group to single out and blame for all the troubles.
….. Deicide: Jews are hated simply because they killed Jesus.
….. Outsiders: Jews are hated due to the fact they are different than the rest of society.
….. Racial Theory: Jews are hated simply because they are an inferior race.
Let us examine these six regularly-provided factors and figure out if they are truly causes or excuses.
—— .. The Financial Theory of Anti-Semitism
The Financial Theory of Anti-Semitism postulates that Jewish wealth and power arouses the envy of other groups, and this in turn leads to wonderful resentment.
This theory has surfaced in distinct guises all through history. One of the methods it became popularized was by way of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the minutes of fictional “secret meetings” in which Jewish leaders conspire to rule the world. Protocols is a viciously anti-Semitic book created by the Russian secret police.
This fictional account has supplied an excellent excuse for campaigns of persecution against Jews, influenced the masses to believe the myth that Jews control governments. It is the second most broadly published book in history.
Do individuals these days nevertheless believe that Jews have some mysterious economic and organizational advantage more than the rest of humanity?
—— Ancient Chinese Secret
A True Story:
A Jewish physicist who functions for Exxon Corporation spent numerous months working on a project in coordination with a world-renowned scientist from China. The two guys developed a very good functioning partnership and became friendly with a single an additional.
One particular day the Chinese scientist commented to the Jew, "You know, ever considering that we very first met I’ve been meaning to ask you a question: Why did you turn out to be a physicist? Why didn’t you just go into enterprise?"
"What type of query is that?" the Jewish scientist replied. "I became a physicist because I wanted to be a physicist!"
"But are not you Jewish?" the Chinese man persisted.
"So what difference does that make?"
"Well," the Chinese scientist patiently explained, "there would be countless dangers involved if I would go into business, but for you it really is risk-free of charge!"
"Forgive me, but I am not following you," stated the Jew. "What sort of organization is risk-free?"
"For you – any business! Come on," he said with a conspirational wink, "we all know you have the Organization behind you."
"Huh? What ‘organization’ are you speaking about?"
"Come on, everybody knows that all Jewish males get income from the Organization when they get married.
That is how all the Jews get began in organization. There’s no danger involved, due to the fact if the organization fails, the Organization buys out the debt and then funnels a lot more begin-up income to the Jew. This goes on until the fellow hits upon a organization that prospers!"
No such fantastically endowed international organization exists. But the assumption of this globe-class scientist demonstrates that the myth of Jewish access to unlimited wealth is alive and well today.
—— .. Applying the Litmus Test
Does this attitude explain anti-Semitism? Is the Economic Theory a trigger or an excuse for anti-Semitism?
First, take into account universal attitudes toward the rich. We don’t see any sustained historical persecution against wealthy non-Jews. Therefore, if the haters choose to single out wealthy Jews and ignore wealthy non-Jews, economics cannot be regarded as the lead to for hatred.
Second, if we eliminate the element of wealth and energy from the Jews, does the anti-Semitism vanish?
The Jews who lived in the shtetels of Poland and Russia throughout the 17th-20th centuries had been poor and powerless, utterly lacking any form of influence whatsoever. However they had been hated. Typically they were persecuted and subjected to unspeakable torments. On numerous occasions whole villages have been ransacked and their Jewish inhabitants massacred in cold blood. Under these situations, anti-Semitism did not distinguish in between wealthy and poor, in between robust and weak, amongst effective and powerless.
Likewise, anti-Semites in the Middle Ages initiated numerous pogroms against Jews (with out initial investigating their bank accounts or investment portfolios).
When the Nazis liquidated the Warsaw Ghetto, there were no Jewish businesses to destroy. In fact, the impoverished circumstances there have been appalling. The Jews in the ghetto could not have been believed of as "rich" by anyone’s standards, and yet the Nazis felt they had to be eliminated.
Poor Jews have always been hated equally as wealthy Jews. When a Jew meets with economic good results, it may possibly set the anti-Semite’s teeth on edge, but the Jew’s accomplishment is clearly not what created the anti-Semite. Income consequently can not be the trigger of anti-Semitism.
—— .. The Fugu Program
How about power? Can it be the trigger of anti-Semitism?
If someone who is wealthy and potent comes to you for a favor, would you persecute him? No, you assist him – obtaining such a person indebted to you is a wonderful insurance coverage policy. Case in point is the Arab oil-creating countries who are broadly appeased, regardless of their requirements that typically fly in the face of Western values.
There was one particular nation that did treat the Jews as if they had been strong and rich. The Japanese by no means had much exposure to Jews, and knew quite tiny about them. In 1919 Japan fought alongside the anti-Semitic White Russians against the Communists. At that time the White Russians introduced the Japanese to the book, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
The Japanese studied the book and, according to all accounts, naively believed its propaganda. Their reaction was immediate and forceful – they formulated a strategy to encourage Jewish settlement and investment into Manchuria. The Japanese decided that these wealthy and effective Jews are precisely the men and women with whom they want to do company!
The Japanese called their plan for Jewish settlement "The Fugu Plan." The "fugu" is a hugely poisonous blowfish. Soon after the toxin-containing organs are painstakingly removed, it is used as a food in Japan, and is regarded an exquisite delicacy. If it is not ready carefully, however, its poison can be deadly.
The Japanese saw the Jews as a nation with hugely valuable potential, but, as with the fugu, in order to take advantage of that possible, they had to be very cautious. Otherwise, the Japanese believed, the plan would backfire and the Jews would annihilate Japan with their great energy.
Duuring Globe War II, the Japanese have been allies of the Nazis, but they permitted thousands of European refugees – such as the entire Mir Yeshivah – to enter Shanghai and Kobe for the duration of the war. They welcomed these Jews into their nation, not due to the fact they bore any fantastic love for the Jews, but since they believed that Jews had access to huge sources and power which could greatly advantage Japan.
(This is all detailed in the book, The Fugu Plan, by Marvin Tokayer.)
If anti-Semites genuinely think that Jews rule the world, then why do not they relate to the Jews like the Japanese did?
The reality that Jews are normally treated as outcasts proves that people do not genuinely believe that Jews are as wealthy or potent as claimed. In other words, the anti-Semites do not take their personal propaganda seriously.
—— .. Whatever Occurred to Jewish Power?
If there is any truth to the notion that Jews control governments, why couldn’t those powerful Jews convince any nation to accept the refugees who have been struggling to escape the European inferno throughout the Holocaust? If "World Jewry" is so powerful and wields such political influence, certainly at least 1 government would have agreed to take them in as refugees and permitted them to remain till the finish of the war…
The film Voyage of the Damned substantially demonstrates how government buried its head in the sand while the wholesale slaughter of Jews went unchecked. As such, the claim that Jews handle governments rings painfully absurd.
—— .. Jews as Moneylenders
In this identical vein, several folks say that anti-Semitism has been caused by the truth that Jews had been income-lenders in many societies and supposedly extracted their "pound of flesh" from their non-Jewish compatriots.
In reality, just the opposite is true. Jews were forced to turn into moneylenders precisely since of the extreme employment limitations which anti-Semitic trends imposed on them. Anti-Semitic laws created it not possible for Jews to personal land, to attend universities or to enter any typical occupations. Cash was the only commodity in which they had been permitted to deal, so lacking any other choice, they became income-lenders.
Hence, we see that Jews were not hated due to the fact they were income-lenders rather, they had been funds-lenders because they had been hated.
Potent Jews or weak Jews, wealthy Jews or poor Jews – they’ve all been hated equally.
Clearly, the economic cause for anti-Semitism is really an excuse.
.
.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
.
.